Facebook Instagram LinkedIn
← Blog

Government

Criminal Liability of Public Servants in SLP

7 min read · August 2025

Criminal Liability of Public Servants in SLP

Holding public office in Mexico entails responsibilities that go far beyond administrative management. Offenses committed in the exercise of public duties can be prosecuted criminally for up to 20 years after they occur.

Applicable legal framework

Criminal liability of public servants in SLP is governed primarily by the State Criminal Code and the National Code of Criminal Procedure. At the federal level, the General Law of Administrative Responsibilities applies when federal resources are involved.

Most common offenses

The criminal offenses most frequently affecting municipal and state officials are:

Statute of limitations: the risk that does not disappear when leaving office

One of the aspects that most surprises officials is that the criminal statute of limitations for offenses committed by public servants can extend up to 20 years when there is financial damage to the State. This means an irregularity committed during a term can be prosecuted long after the official left office.

How to protect yourself during your term

The best defense is documentary prevention. Every significant decision made by an official must be backed by a resolution, minutes, an official memo, or a prior legal opinion. Signing without analysis is the costliest mistake a public servant can make.

Representative case

How we work: before and after

Situation based on real cases handled by the firm. Data modified to protect client confidentiality.

Before

Former mayor facing investigation for embezzlement

A former official was indicted two years after the end of his term, charged with embezzlement of $890,000 related to representation expenses that had no documentary support. He had no backup for any of the questioned expenditures.

After

Case dismissed after proving lawful use of funds

We located expense receipts in the municipal archive, obtained statements from suppliers who had provided services, and established that the amounts corresponded to official events documented in the council minutes. The Prosecutor's Office requested dismissal and the case was closed without a conviction.

Facing a similar situation?

Schedule a consultation
with our team.

Contact the firm →